Literacy Responses


Hold on to Reality

Author's note: This piece is my reflection on the book Fahrenheit 451. My focuses were expressing opinion and using context from the book to help readers understand my purpose behind the piece. I also tried to use a wide range of vocabulary to express ideas and AB transitions between paragraphs.

Technology has evolved over time into something that is an essential part of life. It has gotten to the point where full conversations can take place between a computer program and a human being, which is playing with the line between practicality and reason, and impracticality. Although some inventions have greatly affected the advancement in how we live our lives, others have negatively affected the positive characteristics of a human being.

Ray Bradbury did an outstanding job in Fahrenheit 451 exemplifying how dangerous human-machine interaction can become if we're not careful. He placed the mechanical hound in the book intentionally as symbolism of man’s best friend becoming mechanical, and something to fear rather than a loyal companion. The interactive televisions the size of a living room wall are no coincidence either. The inability to leave the screen is exactly what he fears will come true, and it already has to a less extreme extent. The seashells he mentions in the book are a prediction for ear buds which is incredible considering the book was written in the 1950's when there was no strong evidence that would happen.

In Fahrenheit 451 there are several predictions that are already starting to come true. The book is a warning, a warning of what will happen if we lose what makes us great, what makes us successful. If we continue to follow Ray Bradbury's predictions, and the world really does come to the point where living in a dystopian society is reality, we're going to need a lot more people like Clarisse and Montag. Without people who remember the world as it was, the world will end up burning down . . . along with the books.


The Help


Author's note: I recently read the help after originally finding out about it from seeing the movie. I wanted to compare and contrast the two in a writing piece in a more thoughtful way than "three stars". In this piece I will be working on making a meaningful conclusion, using vocabulary to express thoughts and using pros and cons.

The life for colored people before civil rights was cruel and punishing. Women took jobs working for people that had never faced the hardships that they had, and men took physically exhausting jobs that white men were too proud to do. They were dead end jobs, making just enough to get by. They watched as the children they raised and loved turned into their parents, getting rid of the obliviousness to the fact that they aren't equal.

I believe Kathryn Stockett really captured how the interaction between white and colored women was. In her book she really gets inside of a different mindset, something besides her own. Every chapter comes with a new perspective. I think that the writers for the movie achieved this with subtle remarks that showed off personality, and the actors and actresses did a great job with expressing their emotions such as their frustration or confusion towards their bosses.

Writing a book like The Help at that time in history is incredibly dangerous. By the constant mention of the characters looking over their shoulders and staring at the door, as a reader, it is easy to gather that it's much more than their job that's at stake. In the movie, the actresses playing the maids really captured the emotions and facial expressions of someone who is putting so much at risk. It would've helped if the writers put more of that concept into the script, because someone who hadn't read the book wouldn't have known that every moment Skeeter was at their house they feared their husband or neighbor would stop by. Although, mentioning that what they were doing was illegal in the movie was a very important decision that helped significantly in expressing the danger.

In books, changes in time and place are shown in chapters or in separate paragraphs, but in a movie they are separated by scenes. The layout of the book includes separate chapters for different perspectives. To incorporate this same technique in the movie, the cameras focused more on one person in certain scenes to show their specific emotions towards what's going on at the time.

Overall, most of the thoughts and concepts were transferred from the book to the movie in a logical way. It's always difficult to capture all details from the book to the movie in a reasonable length of film. After all, it's the details that make the book, and the visuals that make a movie. 


Battles in Your Head


Author's note: For this response I chose to use a prompt recommended by Mr. Johnson;

Discuss the changes you have seen take place in Montag so far. Of what do you believe these changes are a result? In this piece I focused on using metaphors and descriptive vocabulary to really explain what is happening to Montag.



Montag is two people. One is hidden, overpowered by the dark, strong, and cruel other that is dominant in the relationship. Then a match is struck, a spark goes off in Montag. The hidden person  makes an appearance after the encounter with Clarisse, and it grows stronger still when he touches the woman's arm, right before she burns herself. This is when he starts realizing how horrid his job really is, and that he wants change. Then the questioning side of him takes over, gains confidence, battles the dark side, and tells his conscience to become of a more curious, and risky nature. 


Montag is at war with himself, and he's suffering from insanity. So many question linger in his brain. "What can I even do with these books? What if there's nothing there? How can I continue doing a job I hate?" His wife's lack of interest and support makes it even harder to go on. Montag can either do something great, or be taken over again by the cold salamander he once was.



Innocence

Author's note: As my first piece in response to Fahrenheit 451, I originally was going to compare Clarisse to Montag. However, seeing that I had so much to say about Clarisse I decided to just show my opinion about her character. In this piece I will be focusing on writing metaphorically and using advanced vocabulary.

She's a candle; a soft glowing light in a dark dystopic world. Clarisse is beautiful to the eyes and to the heart. She questions what other's may just ignore, noticing the beauty in the world; The dew on the grass, the man in the moon, the magnificent rose gardens.  She represents purity, innocence, and beauty.

Clarisse is the type of character you wish you knew personally. She always has something to say, something to question, to challenge. Maybe deep inside of her, she knows how life should be. "Is it true that long ago firemen put fires out instead of going to start them?" Most people would dismiss that thought as a rumor, yet Clarisse knows there's a truth behind it.

To be like Clarisse in a dystopic world is to be a diamond in the ruff. Not always seen, but much admired when you come to find one.   

1 comment:

  1. I love this piece! Your simile in the last paragraph is incredible. You're right about everything you said about Clarisse, she is by far the most normal character(to us). Your an amazing writer!

    ReplyDelete